In today’s digital era, police officers and even employers may find it easier than ever to take advantage of camera and surveillance listening. Surveillance cameras now line many public streets and workplaces in an attempt to monitor activity and law enforcement agencies to continue to use wiretaps to aid in investigations. Although this is becoming more common, there are advantages and disadvantages of using this technology.
Using surveillance cameras from http://www.deluxesurveillance.com/ potentially increases safety in the areas where they reside. Often this is because the camera acts as a deterrent. For example, a camera installed in a workplace supply room may stop an employee from stealing an item stored in the room. Cameras installed on public roads can deter criminals from acting out. If criminal activity does not take place, surveillance cameras can provide employers with the information they need to take disciplinary action and law enforcement officials the evidence needed to make an arrest.
Both camera and surveillance listening can help with collecting evidence. Cameras can show individuals performing certain activities while tapping can capture crucial information. For example, a wiretap can provide law enforcement with the time and location of a drug deal or other criminal act. In the workplace, camera surveillance can record an employee coming over repeatedly to work late, steal or act in a unbefitting manner to the company. The employer can collect these evidence and confront the employee accordingly. Invasion Of Privacy
The biggest disadvantage of the camera and listening surveillance is the perceived invasion of privacy. Although wiretaps require legal authorization from a judge, some may ignore this legality and tap a line without permission. This is an invasion of privacy. Also, some view being on camera as an invasion of privacy, whether at the workplace or on a public street.
Another disadvantage of this type of surveillance is the potential for unreliable information. This is more common in wiretapping, where a lot of unnecessary information is often heard. This information can lead to false leads and can result in a waste of resources. In addition, misinterpretation of only audible information may result in false links or prosecution.